pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

Zcash Ironwood Shielded Pool (NU6.3 + Project Tachyon Formal Proof)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-07-21
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Watch

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
56% · fresh
Computed at
2026-07-21T07:36:41.760917+00:00
Claimed
55

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
49

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
43

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+12

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-07-21

Track; not yet

Why
The record's core notability claim — a completed formal proof that Ironwood contains no hidden counterfeit-minting bugs — is explicitly still pending per the founder's own hedged 'on the verge of producing' framing (2026-07-08); the ZIP spec remains Draft and the shielded pool itself has not yet activated on mainnet (scheduled 2026-07-28). claimedReadiness was reduced from an initially-drafted 70 to 55 to avoid outrunning the vendor's own hedged claim, especially given a real, disclosed precedent bug (May 2026 Orchard counterfeiting flaw, undetected for 4 years) in the predecessor circuit.
Next
Re-evaluate after the July 28, 2026 NU6.3/Ironwood mainnet activation and after Project Tachyon either publishes or continues to withhold the formal counterfeit-freedom proof; also confirm whether zcashd ever gains NU6.3 support or is effectively deprecated in favor of Zebra.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
5
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
2
Tier 3
3
Supports
2
Contradicts
2
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-07-10

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-21 Reading moved from watch to watch.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.