pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model 2.0

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
95

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
78

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
63

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+32

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Critical

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Adopt with guardrails

Why
It is a finished W3C Recommendation (15 May 2025) with real self-reported production deployments, but eIDAS demotes VCDM to an optional EAA-only format, the BBS privacy layer is still pre-Recommendation, and @context complexity invites interop bugs — so constrain the profile rather than adopt unboundedly.
Next
Pin to a single securing mechanism (JOSE or Data Integrity) and one selective-disclosure path; prototype a VCDM-2.0 credential alongside an SD-JWT VC equivalent so the eIDAS dual/optional-format reality is covered without betting solely on VCDM.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
2
Tier 3
4
Supports
3
Contradicts
3
Context
0
Latest observed
2026-04-07

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.