Verification register Agentic Commerce & Payments
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 68
- Reported
- 63
- Verified
- 55
- Gap
- +13
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Critical
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Adopt with guardrails
- Why
- TAP is built on a real IETF standard (RFC 9421), is openly specified under MIT, has 100+ enrolled partners and a multi-PSP Oct 2025 launch, and is already part of our protocol stack — making it the most adoptable of the three. Guardrails needed because the reference impl is demo-grade (6 commits, no releases) and trust is rooted in a Visa-operated key directory.
- Next
- Since TAP is already a named layer in our protocol architecture, validate our TAP identity layer against the published RFC 9421 spec (Ed25519/PS256 signatures, 8-minute validity window, nonce replay protection, agent-browser-auth vs agent-payer-auth tags) and align our header/JWT schema to Visa's; keep our implementation directory-agnostic so we are not hard-bound to Visa's JWKS.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 6
- Tier 1
- 0
- Tier 2
- 3
- Tier 3
- 3
- Supports
- 3
- Contradicts
- 2
- Context
- 1
- Latest observed
- 2026-06-25
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.