Verification register Security & Identity
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 75
- Reported
- 68
- Verified
- 61
- Gap
- +14
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Growing
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Proceed with caution
- Why
- Strong cryptographic-verification story and a genuine differentiator (multi-GPU CC, open-source verifier, Red Hat OSS partnership) fit pv's privacy posture, but it is a startup with no published independent audit of its own stack and unquantified overhead on its own site — verify the attestation chain and cost ourselves before relying on it.
- Next
- Run Tinfoil's client-side attestation verifier against a live enclave for a target model, independently confirm the Sigstore transparency-log match, and benchmark token latency/throughput vs a non-confidential baseline on our actual prompt sizes (small + large batch); test specifically for attestation freshness/nonce and patch-level cert validation per the Trail of Bits findings.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 7
- Tier 1
- 0
- Tier 2
- 3
- Tier 3
- 4
- Supports
- 3
- Contradicts
- 2
- Context
- 2
- Latest observed
- 2026-04-07
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.