pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro

Readiness verdict

Sybil-Epi

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Watch

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
83% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:54:27.470974+00:00
Claimed
55

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
55

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
50

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+5

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Growing

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Track; not yet

Why
Reported AUC uplift on a hard subgroup (no-nodule scans 0.76 vs 0.64), MIT-licensed and reproducible, peer-reviewed in CHEST, but retrospective-only validation, no clearance, and an immature two-stage codebase keep it at evaluation stage.
Next
Pilot the open-source Sybil-Epi against an internal retrospective LDCT cohort to reproduce the reported AUC uplift over Sybil; assess clinical-variable data availability before any prospective consideration.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
14
Tier 1
2
Tier 2
10
Tier 3
2
Supports
8
Contradicts
2
Context
4
Latest observed
2026-03-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from watch to watch.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.