pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro

Readiness verdict

Sybil-Epi

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
55

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
55

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
50

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+5

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Growing

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Track; not yet

Why
Reported AUC uplift on a hard subgroup (no-nodule scans 0.76 vs 0.64), MIT-licensed and reproducible, peer-reviewed in CHEST, but retrospective-only validation, no clearance, and an immature two-stage codebase keep it at evaluation stage.
Next
Pilot the open-source Sybil-Epi against an internal retrospective LDCT cohort to reproduce the reported AUC uplift over Sybil; assess clinical-variable data availability before any prospective consideration.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
7
Tier 1
1
Tier 2
5
Tier 3
1
Supports
4
Contradicts
1
Context
2
Latest observed
2026-03-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.