pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Robotics, Autonomy & Spatial

Readiness verdict

SIMA 2

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
50

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
46

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
40

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+10

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Wait for stronger evidence

Why
Real, quantified progress (roughly doubling SIMA 1, self-improvement without human data) with a clean cross-domain link to Genie 3, but still virtual-only, research-preview, with notable reasoning regressions and precision/long-horizon gaps.
Next
Track sim-to-real transfer and whether self-improvement loops generalize beyond games; revisit when DeepMind reports physical-robot results or opens broader access

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
1
Tier 3
5
Supports
3
Contradicts
2
Context
1
Latest observed
2025-12-05

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.