pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

R0VM 2.0

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Watch

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
75% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:51:59.422703+00:00
Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
59

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
50

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+20

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Critical

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Track; not yet

Why
Real, fast progress (35min to 44s) and broad precompile support, but real-time class needs costly clusters, it is the most expensive option in independent comparisons, and the strongest claims come from affiliated sources; no current pv requirement for a general zkVM.
Next
Watch RISC Zero's Boundless proof-market maturity and any independent audits; reconsider only if pv needs general verifiable compute with broad precompile support.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
11
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
11
Tier 3
0
Supports
2
Contradicts
4
Context
5
Latest observed
2026-06-25

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from watch to watch.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.