pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro

Readiness verdict

Protenix

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Ready

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
76% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:53:59.811834+00:00
Claimed
80

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
79

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
72

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+8

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Adopt with guardrails

Why
Apache 2.0, actively versioned (v2 Apr 2026), strong open benchmarks and a ~200x sampling-efficiency gain in v2 make it the most production-ready open AF3 reproduction; guardrails needed for hard-target sampling cost and independent benchmark verification
Next
Stand up Protenix-v2 (pip install) on internal GPU infra, reproduce PoseBusters/antibody benchmarks with PXMeter, and set seed/sampling budgets per target class

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
9
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
7
Tier 3
2
Supports
7
Contradicts
2
Context
0
Latest observed
2026-04-07

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.