Verification register Security & Identity
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 65
- Reported
- 62
- Verified
- 56
- Gap
- +9
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Growing
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Track; not yet
- Why
- Solid open-governance standards-aligned foundation with active vendor engagement (Arm, Fujitsu), but it is a components toolkit whose flagship CCA path is silicon-blocked — useful to evaluate, premature to standardize on.
- Next
- Prototype Veraison against a TPM/PSA attestation scheme we already control (not CCA) to assess the build-your-own-service effort; reassess as a verifier once a TEE we deploy emits standard EAT/RATS evidence.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 7
- Tier 1
- 0
- Tier 2
- 2
- Tier 3
- 5
- Supports
- 3
- Contradicts
- 2
- Context
- 2
- Latest observed
- 2025-06-08
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.