pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

Project Veraison

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Ready

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
72% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:53:39.71718+00:00
Claimed
65

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
62

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
56

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+9

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Growing

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Track; not yet

Why
Solid open-governance standards-aligned foundation with active vendor engagement (Arm, Fujitsu), but it is a components toolkit whose flagship CCA path is silicon-blocked — useful to evaluate, premature to standardize on.
Next
Prototype Veraison against a TPM/PSA attestation scheme we already control (not CCA) to assess the build-your-own-service effort; reassess as a verifier once a TEE we deploy emits standard EAT/RATS evidence.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
13
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
9
Supports
6
Contradicts
3
Context
4
Latest observed
2025-06-08

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.