Verification register AI & Agents
Current reading
Readiness band and full integer triple
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
Readiness band
Watch
Primary summary from verified readiness
- Confidence
- 76% · fresh
- Computed at
- 2026-10-01T01:34:48.763851+00:00
- Claimed
- 55
- Reported
- 35
- Verified
- 35
- Gap
- +20
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed leads verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-10-01
Pilot the original Bonsai 27B for memory-constrained local assistance with human review.
- Why
- Independent tests demonstrate useful inference, but binary code quality, long-context retrieval failures and workflow errors constrain unattended use.
- Next
- Pin the model variant and compatible runtime, then test task success, useful context retention, peak memory and sustained latency on intended hardware.
Constraints
Blockers
- Binary code generation can lose substantial quality relative to ternary.
- Allocated context length does not guarantee reliable retrieval.
- Long-horizon coding and paperwork workflows require human review.
- Prompt ingestion and reasoning can create substantial latency.
- Total runtime memory exceeds the advertised weight footprint.
- Ternary formats require compatible runtimes; legacy files are deprecated.
- Independent sustained phone performance remains unestablished.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 11
- Tier 1
- 4
- Tier 2
- 7
- Tier 3
- 0
- Supports
- 3
- Contradicts
- 5
- Context
- 3
- Latest observed
- 2026-09-21
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Revision 3
- 2026-07-21 Reading moved from watch to watch.
- 2026-09-22 Reading moved from watch to watch.
- 2026-10-01 Reading moved from watch to watch.