pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro

Readiness verdict

Precision Neuroscience Layer 7

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
60

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
60

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
57

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+3

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Track; not yet

Why
The most clinically mature of the three — actual FDA 510(k) clearance, a peer-reviewed Nature paper, 50+ patients, and a Medtronic partnership — but the 30-day cap and mapping-only indication mean it is a research/intra-op tool today, not an adoptable assistive interface.
Next
Monitor for a chronic-implant clearance and any commercial/clinical decoding product; the Nature Biomed Eng paper (s41551-025-01501-w) plus the Jan 2026 Medtronic partnership are the key items to review

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
3
Tier 2
1
Tier 3
2
Supports
4
Contradicts
1
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-01-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.