Verification register Energy, Climate, Space & Materials
Current reading
Readiness band and full integer triple
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
Readiness band
Watch
Primary summary from verified readiness
- Confidence
- 96% · stale
- Computed at
- 2026-10-01T07:55:36.831313+00:00
- Claimed
- 55
- Reported
- 40
- Verified
- 35
- Gap
- +20
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed leads verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-10-01
Use original PET-MAD for research simulations when target-specific reference checks pass.
- Why
- Independent tests demonstrate numerical robustness and selected structural successes, alongside material-dependent errors.
- Next
- Validate the exact checkpoint against matching electronic-structure references for the intended materials, properties and conditions.
Constraints
Blockers
- Numerical stability does not ensure correct structures or phase ordering.
- Accuracy varies by chemistry and coordination environment.
- Checkpoint and reference-functional differences complicate comparisons.
- Target-specific validation or fine-tuning may be necessary.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 14
- Tier 1
- 12
- Tier 2
- 2
- Tier 3
- 0
- Supports
- 9
- Contradicts
- 1
- Context
- 4
- Latest observed
- 2026-07-01
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Revision 3
- 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.
- 2026-09-22 Reading moved from ready to ready.
- 2026-10-01 Reading moved from ready to watch.