pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Energy, Climate, Space & Materials

Readiness verdict

PET-MAD

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Ready

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
75% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:54:15.592336+00:00
Claimed
80

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
80

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
74

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+6

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Adopt with guardrails

Why
Peer-reviewed (Nat Commun, Nov 2025), lightweight, fastest in its class, and cheaply fine-tunable — strong for high-throughput screening, but the GGA bias and benchmark-to-property gap mean numbers must be DFT-validated before decisions.
Next
Pilot PET-MAD for MD screening on an in-house chemistry, validate against a small DFT reference set, and LoRA-fine-tune before trusting any functional-property number.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
12
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
8
Supports
8
Contradicts
2
Context
2
Latest observed
2026-02-09

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.