pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

Originator Profile (OP)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
55

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
55

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
48

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+7

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Track; not yet

Why
Genuinely complementary to C2PA (publisher/originator identity vs per-asset provenance) and backed by major Japanese media/telecom, but pre-standard, Japan-centric, and dependent on browser preinstall that does not exist.
Next
Monitor OP-CIP standardization progress and whether OP converges with or stays parallel to C2PA; evaluate the released GitHub spec for DID/credential overlap with our trust graph Layer 1.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
7
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
3
Supports
5
Contradicts
2
Context
0
Latest observed
2026-06-25

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.