pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Robotics, Autonomy & Spatial

Readiness verdict

OpenXR Spatial Entities Extensions

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Ready

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
75% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:54:26.789232+00:00
Claimed
72

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
72

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
67

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+5

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Adopt with guardrails

Why
Ratified Khronos standard with broad vendor backing is the right long-term bet, and real implementations now ship — but runtime maturity still varies, so adopt behind feature detection rather than assuming uniform support.
Next
Target XR_EXT_spatial_anchor + plane/marker tracking via OpenXR 1.1; verify per-runtime support (Quest, Pico, Galaxy XR) at build time and keep a capability-query fallback path. Godot 4.6 offers a one-APK cross-vendor reference path.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
13
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
9
Supports
9
Contradicts
2
Context
2
Latest observed
2026-01-26

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.