pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

OpenID4VC High Assurance Interoperability Profile (HAIP) 1.0

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-10-01
Revision
3
Method
v1.4.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Watch

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
87% · fresh
Computed at
2026-10-01T07:49:16.137492+00:00
Claimed
55

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
55

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
35

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+20

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Critical

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-10-01

Consider HAIP 1.0 for deployments with a defined trust ecosystem and tested flows.

Why
Operational verifier reports and constrained conformance results support adoption. Full high assurance also depends on ecosystem and operational controls.
Next
Test the exact issuer, wallet, verifier, format and transport, including invalid inputs, attestation and trust requirements.

Constraints

Blockers

  • Trust-anchor and ecosystem-policy integration
  • Additional controls for eIDAS LoA High
  • Format and transport-specific interoperability
  • Limited independently inspectable attestation validation
  • Operational security assessment beyond conformance

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
11
Tier 1
8
Tier 2
3
Tier 3
0
Supports
7
Contradicts
3
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-09-28

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Revision 3

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.
  2. 2026-09-22 Reading moved from ready to ready.
  3. 2026-10-01 Reading moved from ready to watch.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.