Verification register AI & Agents
Current reading
Readiness band and full integer triple
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
Readiness band
Emerging
Primary summary from verified readiness
- Confidence
- 72% · stale
- Computed at
- 2026-10-24T19:23:31.063993+00:00
- Claimed
- 55
- Reported
- 35
- Verified
- 25
- Gap
- +30
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed leads verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-10-24
Use SWE-bench Verified as a supplementary historical benchmark, with independent patch review.
- Why
- It remains executable, but contamination, invalid tasks and defects missed by passing tests limit its value for measuring frontier coding progress.
- Next
- Pair results with fresh tasks, controlled training-data exposure and semantic correctness checks; assess replacement benchmarks independently.
Constraints
Blockers
- Training contamination can inflate scores.
- Passing tests can miss incorrect patches.
- Some tasks reject functionally valid solutions.
- Small edits in familiar Python repositories limit generalization.
- Scaffolding and infrastructure exclusions complicate comparisons.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 10
- Tier 1
- 5
- Tier 2
- 4
- Tier 3
- 1
- Supports
- 2
- Contradicts
- 6
- Context
- 2
- Latest observed
- 2026-09-22
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Revision 2
- 2026-07-27 Reading moved from emerging to emerging.
- 2026-10-01 Reading moved from emerging to emerging.