pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

OpenAI Safety Evaluations Hub

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
63

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
56

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+14

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Growing

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Proceed with caution

Why
Genuinely useful longitudinal transparency artifact, but vendor-self-reported with discretionary cadence and no external audit — informative, not authoritative.
Next
Use the Hub as one input for model risk comparison over time, but cross-check against independent benchmarks (e.g., third-party jailbreak/hallucination evals and the joint Anthropic-OpenAI exercises) before relying on any claimed score.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
1
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
1
Supports
2
Contradicts
1
Context
3
Latest observed
2025-08-27

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.