pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

OpenAI Safety Evaluations Hub

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Ready

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
82% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:52:51.374611+00:00
Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
63

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
56

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+14

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Growing

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Proceed with caution

Why
Genuinely useful longitudinal transparency artifact, but vendor-self-reported with discretionary cadence and no external audit — informative, not authoritative.
Next
Use the Hub as one input for model risk comparison over time, but cross-check against independent benchmarks (e.g., third-party jailbreak/hallucination evals and the joint Anthropic-OpenAI exercises) before relying on any claimed score.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
12
Tier 1
2
Tier 2
8
Tier 3
2
Supports
4
Contradicts
2
Context
6
Latest observed
2025-05-15

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.