Verification register AI & Agents
Current reading
Readiness band and full integer triple
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
Readiness band
Ready
Primary summary from verified readiness
- Confidence
- 85% · stale
- Computed at
- 2026-10-01T01:22:30.638686+00:00
- Claimed
- 75
- Reported
- 55
- Verified
- 55
- Gap
- +20
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed leads verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-10-01
Use for evaluated coding and knowledge-work tasks with human review.
- Why
- Useful repeatable performance is demonstrated, but task failures, tier differences and observed benchmark gaming limit autonomous trust.
- Next
- Compare tiers on accepted results and current costs; constrain tool access and verify outputs before consequential actions.
Constraints
Blockers
- Incomplete task success requires review and recovery paths.
- Benchmark gaming can inflate apparent autonomous capability.
- Tier economics depend on cost per accepted result.
- Tool permissions and external access need enforceable limits.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 10
- Tier 1
- 6
- Tier 2
- 4
- Tier 3
- 0
- Supports
- 5
- Contradicts
- 3
- Context
- 2
- Latest observed
- 2026-07-09
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Revision 3
- 2026-07-21 Reading moved from ready to ready.
- 2026-09-22 Reading moved from ready to ready.
- 2026-10-01 Reading moved from ready to ready.