pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro

Readiness verdict

OMICmAge (multi-omic epigenetic clock)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
78

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
74

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
63

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+15

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Adopt with guardrails

Why
Now peer-reviewed in Nature Aging (March 2026, Harvard-led) with external validation at scale (TruDiagnostic n~12,666 plus Generation Scotland and ORCADES) and mortality ROC ~0.88–0.89 — the most evidence-backed of the three — but the marginal lift over simpler clocks is modest and the model is explicitly non-causal, so use it as a validated correlate, not a causal target.
Next
Cite OMICmAge as a now-peer-reviewed (Nature Aging, 2026), externally-validated mortality-associated clock but pair it with the authors' non-causality and single-cohort caveats; track diverse-population and clinical-setting replication before using it for individual-level decisions

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
1
Tier 2
5
Tier 3
0
Supports
4
Contradicts
1
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-03-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.