Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 78
- Reported
- 74
- Verified
- 63
- Gap
- +15
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Adopt with guardrails
- Why
- Now peer-reviewed in Nature Aging (March 2026, Harvard-led) with external validation at scale (TruDiagnostic n~12,666 plus Generation Scotland and ORCADES) and mortality ROC ~0.88–0.89 — the most evidence-backed of the three — but the marginal lift over simpler clocks is modest and the model is explicitly non-causal, so use it as a validated correlate, not a causal target.
- Next
- Cite OMICmAge as a now-peer-reviewed (Nature Aging, 2026), externally-validated mortality-associated clock but pair it with the authors' non-causality and single-cohort caveats; track diverse-population and clinical-setting replication before using it for individual-level decisions
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 6
- Tier 1
- 1
- Tier 2
- 5
- Tier 3
- 0
- Supports
- 4
- Contradicts
- 1
- Context
- 1
- Latest observed
- 2026-03-01
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.