pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro

Readiness verdict

OMICmAge (multi-omic epigenetic clock)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Ready

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
83% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:52:41.015078+00:00
Claimed
78

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
74

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
63

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+15

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Adopt with guardrails

Why
Now peer-reviewed in Nature Aging (March 2026, Harvard-led) with external validation at scale (TruDiagnostic n~12,666 plus Generation Scotland and ORCADES) and mortality ROC ~0.88–0.89 — the most evidence-backed of the three — but the marginal lift over simpler clocks is modest and the model is explicitly non-causal, so use it as a validated correlate, not a causal target.
Next
Cite OMICmAge as a now-peer-reviewed (Nature Aging, 2026), externally-validated mortality-associated clock but pair it with the authors' non-causality and single-cohort caveats; track diverse-population and clinical-setting replication before using it for individual-level decisions

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
10
Tier 1
2
Tier 2
8
Tier 3
0
Supports
7
Contradicts
2
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-03-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.