pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

NIST SP 800-63-4 Digital Identity Guidelines

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Mature

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
77% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:54:14.444672+00:00
Claimed
95

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
95

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
89

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+6

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Adopt with guardrails

Why
Final, authoritative standard that directly governs our KYC/identity posture; the risk-based DIRM framing and phishing-resistant + deepfake/injection requirements are exactly where the ecosystem trust layer is heading, but it is normative work, not a drop-in.
Next
Map current proofing/auth flows to IAL/AAL/FAL targets via the DIRM process and gap-check PAD + injection-attack-detection obligations against vendors; record as a decision ADR before any code change (Rule #19 strategic gate).

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
10
Tier 1
1
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
5
Supports
6
Contradicts
2
Context
2
Latest observed
2025-12-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from mature to mature.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.