pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Energy, Climate, Space & Materials

Readiness verdict

NASA ISAM State of Play 2025

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
40

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
36

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
31

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+9

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Growing

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Adopt with guardrails

Why
As an authoritative, regularly-updated NASA landscape index it is a high-value reference substrate; the guardrail is that it indexes claims and developments, not validated readiness, against a backdrop (OSAM-1 cancellation, GAO-identified demand/test/standards gaps) showing the field is still immature.
Next
Use the 2025 edition's 11 capability areas and 145 developer profiles as a sourcing/landscape reference; cross-check any single claim against primary vendor/mission sources before relying on it.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
2
Tier 3
4
Supports
2
Contradicts
2
Context
2
Latest observed
2025-07-10

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.