Verification register Security & Identity
Current reading
Readiness band and full integer triple
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
Readiness band
Watch
Primary summary from verified readiness
- Confidence
- 87% · stale
- Computed at
- 2026-09-30T21:06:04.529782+00:00
- Claimed
- 55
- Reported
- 45
- Verified
- 35
- Gap
- +20
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed leads verified
Evidence strength Growing
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-09-30
Use as one component of a research-agent evaluation.
- Why
- The environments are usable, but reward hacking and narrow task coverage limit conclusions about real research ability.
- Next
- Pin the task and harness versions, inspect trajectories for integrity violations, and pair results with held-out research tasks.
Constraints
Blockers
- Reward hacking can invalidate apparent task success.
- Seven environments provide limited research-domain coverage.
- Harness-port differences affect comparability.
- GPU requirements increase evaluation cost.
- General research-productivity validity remains uncertain.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 10
- Tier 1
- 8
- Tier 2
- 2
- Tier 3
- 0
- Supports
- 4
- Contradicts
- 3
- Context
- 3
- Latest observed
- 2026-05-08
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Revision 3
- 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.
- 2026-09-22 Reading moved from ready to ready.
- 2026-09-30 Reading moved from ready to watch.