pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register AI & Agents

Readiness verdict

MCP-Bench

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Ready

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
69% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:53:16.316764+00:00
Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
66

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
59

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+11

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Growing

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Adopt with guardrails

Why
It is the most directly relevant public benchmark for our MCP-heavy architecture, but external-key fragility and an unsaturated, judge-coupled metric mean it should inform internal gates, not be a hard public claim.
Next
Pilot MCP-Bench's multi-server task set against our own MCP tool fleet (apps/mcp-*) as an offline regression gate; pin the judge model and cache external API fixtures to make reruns deterministic. Reuse its Tool Name Validity Rate / Schema Compliance Rate as cheap rule-based checks.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
11
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
5
Tier 3
6
Supports
6
Contradicts
4
Context
1
Latest observed
2025-09-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.