pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro

Readiness verdict

Life Biosciences ER-100 (Partial Epigenetic Reprogramming)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
35

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
35

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
32

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+3

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Too early to adopt

Why
First-in-human dosing plus a $80M Series D (Apr 2026) make this a genuine milestone, but it is an 18-patient Phase 1 safety trial of a modality whose central oncogenic-vs-rejuvenation risk is still unresolved in the literature; nothing is adoptable, only watchable
Next
Track the NCT07290244 Day-112 safety / dose-limiting-toxicity readout (primary completion ~May 2027) and any exploratory visual-function signal; do not treat partial reprogramming as a deployable modality until a clean human safety window is demonstrated

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
7
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
0
Tier 3
7
Supports
3
Contradicts
1
Context
3
Latest observed
2026-06-09

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.