pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Robotics, Autonomy & Spatial

Readiness verdict

KHR_gaussian_splatting (glTF extension)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Watch

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
60% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:52:04.80318+00:00
Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
61

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
51

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+19

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Track; not yet

Why
Backing from Autodesk, Cesium/Bentley, Esri, Niantic, NVIDIA, Huawei and XGRIDS makes it the likely interop winner, but RC status plus deferred compression means production pipelines would be built on a moving target.
Next
Prototype an import path against CesiumJS/Scaniverse RC exports; revisit at ratification (Q2 2026) before committing pipeline.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
10
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
0
Tier 3
10
Supports
5
Contradicts
5
Context
0
Latest observed
2026-02-03

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from watch to watch.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.