pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Robotics, Autonomy & Spatial

Readiness verdict

Johnson & Johnson Ottava Robotic Surgical System

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
55

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
53

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
46

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+9

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Wait for stronger evidence

Why
Credible backer and a differentiated unified/integrated-table design, but pre-clearance via a no-predicate pathway with a documented delay history and no disclosed launch date.
Next
Hold until FDA grants the De Novo and pivotal data publishes; then reassess the integrated-table workflow claims against Hugo/da Vinci on real cases and cost-per-case.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
7
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
5
Tier 3
2
Supports
5
Contradicts
2
Context
0
Latest observed
2026-02-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.