pragma.vision Technology observatory

Verification register AI & Agents

Readiness verdict

Frontier-Bench v0.1

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-07-30
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Unknown

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
66% · fresh
Computed at
2026-07-30T10:51:45.548508+00:00
Claimed
15

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
15

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
14

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+1

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Critical

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-07-30

Track; not yet

Why
Strong pedigree (Terminal-Bench/Harbor team, Andy Konwinski/Laude Institute, Anthropic+OpenAI+Google+Modal compute sponsorship) and a real discriminative signal (12.7-point vs 4.9-point model separation vs Terminal-Bench 2.1), but v0.1 is one week old, unproven at scale, and has shown no independent pickup yet beyond its own repository.
Next
Re-check at Frontier-Bench v0.2+ or once task count grows materially past 74, and once independent model-provider citations (not just sponsor logos) appear before treating it as an internal eval reference.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
5
Tier 1
1
Tier 2
1
Tier 3
3
Supports
3
Contradicts
1
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-07-24

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-30 Reading moved from unknown to unknown.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.