pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

FIDO Credential Exchange Format (CXF)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-08-20
Revision
1
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Ready

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
79% · stale
Computed at
2026-08-20T10:52:54.786315+00:00
Claimed
72

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
68

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
59

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+13

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-08-20

Proceed with caution

Why
Further along than CXP (Proposed Standard, shipping in Apple OSes and early third-party managers) and the data format is the lower-risk half; only the move from Proposed to Final and the historical key-encoding ambiguity warrant caution.
Next
Pin to the 2025-08-14 Proposed Standard's finalized passkey key encoding; treat CXF as the credible data-format target for any future import/export feature, revalidating against the Final spec when published.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
11
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
8
Tier 3
3
Supports
9
Contradicts
2
Context
0
Latest observed
2025-08-14

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from ready to ready.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.