pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Energy, Climate, Space & Materials

Readiness verdict

Ebb Carbon Marine CDR (Microsoft offtake)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
55

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
40

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
28

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+27

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Proceed with caution

Why
Strongest commercial validation in marine CDR (Microsoft, Google, Saudi Water Authority) plus live operations, but verified delivery is tiny vs. contracted volumes and the MRV + acidification-mitigation science carries documented, peer-reviewed limitations.
Next
Track Project Macoma's verified delivered tonnes against its <=1,000t pilot target and whether Isometric-verified credits are issued at the promised quality before treating the 350kt Microsoft / 3.5kt Google offtakes as bankable.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
5
Tier 3
1
Supports
2
Contradicts
3
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-04-30

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.