pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Energy, Climate, Space & Materials

Readiness verdict

Eavor-Loop (Geretsried)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-09-22
Revision
2
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Watch

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
66% · stale
Computed at
2026-09-22T23:27:14.984527+00:00
Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
61

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
52

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+18

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-09-22

Proceed with caution

Why
A real world-first: closed-loop geothermal delivering grid power with strong drilling-learning gains and model-matched performance (within 0.5%) — but it produces only ~0.5 MW so far, ran 2+ years vs ~107 days planned, leans on heavy subsidy, and full-capacity plus long-term economics are unproven
Next
Track the ramp from ~0.5 MW toward full 64 MWth / ~8.2 MWe (second loop from March 2026) and the first unsubsidized cost figures; watch whether the per-pair drilling-time gains (54.5 to 16.5 days/lateral pair) hold on a greenfield site without grant support

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
2
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
0
Supports
2
Contradicts
3
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-01-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Revision 2

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from watch to watch.
  2. 2026-09-22 Reading moved from watch to watch.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.