pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Energy, Climate, Space & Materials

Readiness verdict

Eavor-Loop (Geretsried)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
61

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
52

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+18

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Proceed with caution

Why
A real world-first: closed-loop geothermal delivering grid power with strong drilling-learning gains and model-matched performance (within 0.5%) — but it produces only ~0.5 MW so far, ran 2+ years vs ~107 days planned, leans on heavy subsidy, and full-capacity plus long-term economics are unproven
Next
Track the ramp from ~0.5 MW toward full 64 MWth / ~8.2 MWe (second loop from March 2026) and the first unsubsidized cost figures; watch whether the per-pair drilling-time gains (54.5 to 16.5 days/lateral pair) hold on a greenfield site without grant support

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
2
Supports
2
Contradicts
3
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-01-01

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.