pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

did:webvh (did:web + Verifiable History)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
85

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
83

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
76

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+9

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Critical

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Track; not yet

Why
v1.0 with three interoperable implementations plus a Swiss national e-ID selection and emerging commercial resolver support are real maturity signals and it is a clean upgrade path from did:web, but production adopters are profiling the spec down and witness security is still not turnkey.
Next
Prototype did:webvh log resolution against the BC Gov TypeScript implementation in a trust-authority sandbox; compare against current did:web usage and review swiyu's profile restrictions before any production commitment

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
7
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
2
Tier 3
5
Supports
4
Contradicts
1
Context
2
Latest observed
2026-06-25

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.