pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Energy, Climate, Space & Materials

Readiness verdict

Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.1

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
75

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
64

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
54

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+21

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Adopt with guardrails

Why
The data model is stable and standards-backed (Tier 3) and already underpins the isolated trust root, but CR status plus a documented major-vendor retreat and resolution-latency limitations mean we should constrain method choice rather than adopt the spec wholesale.
Next
Pin to a specific DID method (did:web / did:key resolve without chain latency) and treat v1.1 as a moving CR target until it reaches Recommendation; add a conformance test against the two-implementations exit criteria.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
1
Tier 2
2
Tier 3
3
Supports
1
Contradicts
2
Context
3
Latest observed
2026-03-06

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.