Verification register AI & Agents
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 88
- Reported
- 76
- Verified
- 65
- Gap
- +23
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Adopt with guardrails
- Why
- Strong open-weight coding capability at a fraction of frontier closed-model cost (AA: V4-Pro runs the Index for $1,071 vs Opus 4.7 $4,811) is compelling, but a 94% hallucination rate and a verified ~8-month frontier gap mean it cannot be trusted unsupervised on high-stakes or long-horizon work.
- Next
- Pilot V4-Pro (high/max tier) on a non-critical coding workflow with mandatory abstention prompting + human review on long-context tasks; benchmark internal hallucination rate before any production path.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 7
- Tier 1
- 1
- Tier 2
- 2
- Tier 3
- 4
- Supports
- 2
- Contradicts
- 4
- Context
- 1
- Latest observed
- 2026-06-13
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.