Verification register Security & Identity
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 75
- Reported
- 69
- Verified
- 61
- Gap
- +14
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Track; not yet
- Why
- It is a governance framework (a vendor's voluntary risk policy), not a product; valuable as a maturing, public, third-iteration reference with concrete reports, but with no enforcement, no quantitative thresholds, and self-described nascent misalignment methodology.
- Next
- Use FSF v3's CCL/TCL taxonomy and published Gemini FSF reports as a reference template for our own deployment risk-tiering; do not treat the framework as an adoptable tool or external assurance.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 7
- Tier 1
- 0
- Tier 2
- 1
- Tier 3
- 6
- Supports
- 4
- Contradicts
- 2
- Context
- 1
- Latest observed
- 2026-04-17
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.