pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register AI & Agents

Readiness verdict

Decart MirageLSD

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
67

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
61

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+9

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Proceed with caution

Why
Genuinely novel real-time capability with credible numbers, but Hopper-bound hosting, output-quality gap vs offline models, and long-session drift make it unsuitable for a load-bearing production path today — and the vendor has already moved the frontier to Lucy 2.0, so build against the current model, not MirageLSD.
Next
Run a bounded pilot via Decart's hosted endpoint (Crusoe Cloud exclusive) on a single live-transform use case, and evaluate the newer Lucy 2.0 (30fps/1080p) in the same test; measure latency + drift on real footage before any product dependency.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
7
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
3
Supports
2
Contradicts
2
Context
3
Latest observed
2026-01-26

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.