Verification register Robotics, Autonomy & Spatial
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 80
- Reported
- 80
- Verified
- 76
- Gap
- +4
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Growing
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Proceed with caution
- Why
- Best-in-class, peer-reviewed (ICRA 2020), BSD-3 multi-contact OC framework with demonstrated sub-10ms state-feedback control on real hardware (Talos), but real-time viability is strongly DoF- and hardware-dependent — adoption requires per-robot benchmarking, not a blanket commitment.
- Next
- Prototype the target robot's DDP problem in Crocoddyl, measure per-iteration solve time on the intended onboard compute, and decide between low-DoF real-time MPC vs offline trajectory generation with a memory-of-motion warm-start strategy.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 6
- Tier 1
- 0
- Tier 2
- 2
- Tier 3
- 4
- Supports
- 5
- Contradicts
- 1
- Context
- 0
- Latest observed
- 2026-05-10
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.