pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Compute & Web Infra

Readiness verdict

Coroot

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
90

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
88

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
82

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+8

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Critical

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Low-friction candidate

Why
Open-source, eBPF zero-instrumentation, and order-of-magnitude cheaper than Datadog ($162 vs $22,564/mo for a 5-node example) make it a cheap, reversible trial — the main caveats (AI gated, kernel needs, self-host backend ops) are easy to test up front.
Next
Self-host the Apache-2.0 community edition on a non-prod Kubernetes cluster, validate eBPF service-map coverage and kernel compatibility plus the Prometheus/ClickHouse backend footprint, then price the Enterprise tier ($1/core/mo) for the AI RCA add-on.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
8
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
4
Tier 3
4
Supports
5
Contradicts
1
Context
2
Latest observed
2026-06-24

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.