pragma.vision Technology observatory & strategic foresight

Verification register Energy, Climate, Space & Materials

Readiness verdict

Climeworks Generation 3 DAC

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-09-22
Revision
2
Method
v1.3.0

Current reading

Readiness band and full integer triple

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Readiness band

Watch

Primary summary from verified readiness

Confidence
65% · stale
Computed at
2026-09-22T23:27:14.984527+00:00
Claimed
55

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
44

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
35

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+20

Claimed leads verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-09-22

Wait for stronger evidence

Why
Pilot energy/capacity claims are credible and well-sourced, but the only commercial-scale data (Mammoth/Orca) shows roughly one-thousandth of design output and a company in retrenchment — a textbook claim-vs-observed gap.
Next
Re-evaluate after the Louisiana Gen 3 plant reports verified net-tonnes-vs-nameplate for a full operating year; never anchor any pv carbon claim to Climeworks nameplate numbers.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
7
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
6
Tier 3
1
Supports
1
Contradicts
3
Context
3
Latest observed
2025-05-16

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Revision 2

  1. 2026-07-19 Reading moved from watch to watch.
  2. 2026-09-22 Reading moved from watch to watch.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.