Verification register AI & Agents
Current reading
Readiness band and full integer triple
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
Readiness band
Watch
Primary summary from verified readiness
- Confidence
- 76% · stale
- Computed at
- 2026-09-30T23:55:41.38974+00:00
- Claimed
- 65
- Reported
- 55
- Verified
- 45
- Gap
- +20
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed leads verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-09-30
Suitable for selective supervised coding and bounded agent workflows after workload testing.
- Why
- Independent results demonstrate useful operation, but missed critical defects, insecure code and unintended actions limit unattended deployment.
- Next
- Specify security controls explicitly, check dependencies and authorization, test consequential actions, and retain human review and spending limits.
Constraints
Blockers
- Critical defects can be missed during code review.
- Generated code can omit authorization and expose personal data.
- Dependency choices require vulnerability checks.
- Agent actions can cause unintended harm.
- Harness settings and long sessions require regression testing and budgets.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 10
- Tier 1
- 6
- Tier 2
- 2
- Tier 3
- 2
- Supports
- 3
- Contradicts
- 5
- Context
- 2
- Latest observed
- 2026-08-07
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Revision 3
- 2026-07-19 Reading moved from mature to mature.
- 2026-09-22 Reading moved from mature to mature.
- 2026-09-30 Reading moved from mature to watch.