pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register AI & Agents

Readiness verdict

Claude Opus 4.5 (Vision / Computer Use)

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
85

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
74

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
63

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+22

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Strong

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Adopt with guardrails

Why
GA, well-documented, priced at $5/$25 per Mtok, strong agentic/vision capability and token efficiency — but ~66% computer-use success and newer successors mean it needs guardrails and may warrant an upgrade for high-stakes automation.
Next
Use for vision-grounded agentic and computer-use flows behind human-in-the-loop confirmation on irreversible actions; evaluate upgrade to Opus 4.6/4.8 where OSWorld reliability is load-bearing.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
6
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
3
Tier 3
3
Supports
3
Contradicts
3
Context
0
Latest observed
2026-05-28

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.