Verification register Security & Identity
Current reading
Readiness band and full integer triple
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
Readiness band
Watch
Primary summary from verified readiness
- Confidence
- 81% · fresh
- Computed at
- 2026-09-30T23:56:00.08723+00:00
- Claimed
- 55
- Reported
- 35
- Verified
- 35
- Gap
- +20
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed leads verified
Evidence strength Critical
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-09-30
Keep adoption conditional on a current parameter-level security assessment.
- Why
- The ISO specification and working implementations are established, while recent cryptanalysis challenges earlier security estimates without demonstrating practical full-size key recovery.
- Next
- Review the latest attack and memory-cost models, benchmark key distribution, and preserve the ability to change algorithms and parameters.
Constraints
Blockers
- Recent cryptanalysis challenges advertised parameter security margins.
- Attack estimates depend on heuristic and memory-cost assumptions.
- Public keys of roughly 0.5–1.4 MB complicate distribution and storage.
- Confirmation variants have less directly comparable test evidence.
- Standardization does not establish implementation side-channel resistance.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 9
- Tier 1
- 5
- Tier 2
- 4
- Tier 3
- 0
- Supports
- 4
- Contradicts
- 3
- Context
- 2
- Latest observed
- 2026-09-25
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Revision 2
- 2026-07-21 Reading moved from watch to watch.
- 2026-09-30 Reading moved from watch to watch.