pragma.vision Your technology observatory

Verification register Security & Identity

Readiness verdict

C2PA Trust List & Conformance Program

A dated reading of what is claimed, reported, and independently verified in the current evidence.

As of
2026-06-28
Revision
1
Method
v1.0.0

Current reading

The readiness gap, in one scan

AI-assisted assembly · derived results

Claimed
70

Public ambition and stated capability

Reported
62

Observed practitioner reporting

Verified
53

Independently supported evidence

Gap
+17

Claimed minus verified

Evidence strength Critical

Decision

What the current evidence supports

Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28

Adopt with guardrails

Why
This is the maturing trust backbone for the whole provenance ecosystem (76 conformant products from 85 records, two trust lists, ITL frozen) but has concrete, exploitable gaps — sparse CA coverage, default-off revocation, and self-signed forgeries.
Next
If consuming C2PA, validate against the C2PA Trust List AND explicitly enable revocation checking (do not rely on c2patool defaults); treat trust-list traceability, not signature validity alone, as the trust signal.

Constraints

Blockers

No named blocker is present in the current public projection.

Evidence summary

Derived counts

AI-assisted assembly

Total
7
Tier 1
1
Tier 2
5
Tier 3
1
Supports
3
Contradicts
3
Context
1
Latest observed
2026-06-18

Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.

Publication record

Revisions

Initial public reading

This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.

Your opinion

Tell us anything.

What works, what doesn't, what's missing — especially about our watches, lenses, and the register itself. Anonymous is fine; leave an email if you'd like a reply.