Verification register AI & Agents
Current reading
Readiness band and full integer triple
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
Readiness band
Emerging
Primary summary from verified readiness
- Confidence
- 87% · fresh
- Computed at
- 2026-10-02T00:16:37.404911+00:00
- Claimed
- 55
- Reported
- 35
- Verified
- 25
- Gap
- +30
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed leads verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Agent-assisted assessment · independently reviewed · 2026-10-02
Use BFCL V4 conditionally for exploratory model comparisons.
- Why
- Independent researchers have used its task subsets, but audits found grading errors, brittle state matching and stale answers that can distort rankings.
- Next
- Pin the evaluator and search configuration, inspect relevant task labels and failed traces, and supplement results with repeated tests on your own workflows.
Constraints
Blockers
- Incorrect or brittle grading can reject valid tool use or accept invalid responses.
- Live-web questions can outlast their recorded answers.
- Search-provider and harness differences limit comparability across runs.
- Repeated tool descriptions limit corpus diversity.
- Full trace-level evidence for one major audit remains unavailable.
- Benchmark scores require validation against the intended application workflows.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 13
- Tier 1
- 11
- Tier 2
- 2
- Tier 3
- 0
- Supports
- 6
- Contradicts
- 4
- Context
- 3
- Latest observed
- 2026-09-10
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Revision 4
- 2026-07-19 Reading moved from mature to mature.
- 2026-09-22 Reading moved from mature to mature.
- 2026-09-30 Reading moved from mature to watch.
- 2026-10-02 Reading moved from watch to emerging.