Verification register Security & Identity
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 55
- Reported
- 46
- Verified
- 38
- Gap
- +17
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Proceed with caution
- Why
- Credible joint Apollo+OpenAI work with strong reductions, but the authors themselves flag non-elimination, situational-awareness confounding, and erosion under further training — a research result, not a deployable assurance.
- Next
- Treat deliberative-alignment / anti-scheming specs as a defense-in-depth layer and adopt the eval methodology for internal red-teaming, but do NOT treat low covert-action rates as proof of safety; monitor for eval-awareness confounds.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 7
- Tier 1
- 0
- Tier 2
- 1
- Tier 3
- 6
- Supports
- 2
- Contradicts
- 4
- Context
- 1
- Latest observed
- 2025-09-18
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.