Verification register AI & Agents
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 55
- Reported
- 45
- Verified
- 37
- Gap
- +18
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Adopt with guardrails
- Why
- It is open-source, cheap per run, and has a real (if withdrawn) peer-review milestone, making it the most adoptable of the three for internal research drafting. But the makers' own quality regression, hallucinated-citation risk, and code-execution danger mean it is an assistant under supervision, not an autonomous publisher.
- Next
- Pilot AI-Scientist-v2 agentic tree search for narrow, computational ML write-ups inside a Docker sandbox at the documented $15-25/run budget; never auto-submit output and keep the mandatory AI-disclosure clause; route any external-facing artifact through a human gate.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 7
- Tier 1
- 0
- Tier 2
- 3
- Tier 3
- 4
- Supports
- 3
- Contradicts
- 4
- Context
- 0
- Latest observed
- 2026-03-25
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.