Verification register Bio, Health & Neuro
Current reading
The readiness gap, in one scan
AI-assisted assembly · derived results
- Claimed
- 75
- Reported
- 75
- Verified
- 69
- Gap
- +6
Public ambition and stated capability
Observed practitioner reporting
Independently supported evidence
Claimed minus verified
Evidence strength Strong
Decision
What the current evidence supports
Human editorial judgment · 2026-06-28
Proceed with caution
- Why
- Now peer-reviewed (Nature, March 2026) with very-high adoption (>100k model downloads, >8M combined HF API requests, >200 preprint citations), but the strongest contradicting evidence (systematic generation failures) is a bioRxiv preprint, so generative use is not yet trustworthy while predictive use is solid.
- Next
- Pilot Evo 2 only for variant-effect prediction/scoring (its validated strength, >90% accuracy on BRCA1 benign-vs-pathogenic) on an internal benchmark; do NOT rely on de novo sequence generation until realism gaps close. Budget H100/BioNeMo-class inference.
Constraints
Blockers
No named blocker is present in the current public projection.
Evidence summary
Derived counts
AI-assisted assembly
- Total
- 6
- Tier 1
- 0
- Tier 2
- 3
- Tier 3
- 3
- Supports
- 5
- Contradicts
- 1
- Context
- 0
- Latest observed
- 2026-03-04
Counts and dates only. Raw signals, private excerpts, trust records, and internal corpus material are not published here.
Publication record
Revisions
Initial public reading
This is the initial public reading. No earlier readiness change is recorded.